ABOUT US

Monday, February 13, 2006

MilVets Logo and Symbolism



MILVETS LOGO AND SYMBOLISM

Task:

Develop a visual logo that is unique to MilVets, and represents a diverse membership and the values set forward in the MilVets About Us statement. The logo must have a simple reproducible design and must not imply DoD affiliation.

Primary meaning:

The Olive Wreath symbolizes our greater purpose of Peace and the corporeal ring symbolizes our life transition to ‘Civilization’. The Spearhead symbolizes our military background. The scarring on the Spearhead symbolizes the war experience in the group.

Secondary meaning:

Olive Wreath - Columbia affiliation: It is the same olive wreath as in the inscription beneath the American flag on Low Plaza, donated by the Grand Army of the Republic (see here and here for background). An olive wreath is also below the Columbia flag on Low Plaza. Therefore, it symbolizes Columbia and Columbia military heritage, and to an extent, our American affiliation. An olive wreath can also symbolize nobility.



Spearhead – Warrior Ethos: Our military is commonly referred to as the "tip of the spear", which is appropriate. At the same time, the spearhead is not a branch nor even U.S. Military specific symbol - it is an ancient symbol of the Warrior Ethos. MilVets is less about defining ourselves by the uniforms we wore or still wear. Our group is more about the common experiences we each internalize in our own way and the values we choose to carry forward from our military histories.

The Spearhead points up for eternal vigilance. Its placement at the center of the Olive Wreath symbolizes the living spirit of the nation’s warrior-defenders in the heart of MilVets.

Aesthetic:

Clean, simple, good balance and symmetry, unmistakable up-down orientation, mostly closed and self-contained design. The primary meaning, if not the secondary meanings, should be obvious. The design should be easily reproducible as a logo on a banner, stationery, apparel, etc..

Concept and symbolism by Eric Chen. Final design by Mike Nicholas with final detailing by Luke Stalcup. Todd Murphy contributed artistic suggestions.

Saturday, February 11, 2006

Transcript of Oscar Escano and Matt Sanchez interviewed on Fox and Friends First

CHANNEL: FOX NEWS. PROGRAM: FOX AND FRIENDS FIRST. AIR DATE: 03FEB06.

Female anchor: And some of our troops are having trouble on campus. We'll tell you why they're not at home at an ivy league university. We'll be right back.

Male anchor: That's not right.

COMMERCIALS.

UPDATE about Egyptian ferry sinking.

** START 0623 hrs.

Host (Peter J. Johnson, Jr): Thanks, Allison. Allegations of anti-military discrimination are being raised at Columbia University, just uptown nearby in Manhattan. With me to explain are Oscar Escano and Matt Sanchez. Both are members of the US Military Veterans of Columbia University organization. Good morning, guys. How are you?

Matt Sanchez, Oscar Escano: Good morning, sir ... good morning.

Host: Who is the President of the organization?

Oscar: I am.

Host: Okay. Oscar, tell me what's going on at Columbia?

Oscar: Well, what we feel is going on is there is a sentiment of sort of an anti-military, basically an intolerance of veterans and military persons, and we'd like to see that changed.

Host: Tell me about you. Are you a military veteran?

Oscar: Yes, sir.

Host: And what's your experience in the military?

Oscar: I served in the US Army in the First Ranger Battalion, from 1999 to 2002, and I fought in Operation Enduring Freedom.

Host: Thank you. And Matt Sanchez, you're a General Studies student at Columbia as well? And you're a Marine reservist?

Matt: Marine reservist.

Host: And you've been activated in the past.

Matt: Yes.

Host: Thank you for your service. What's going on at Columbia and what have you experienced?

Matt: What I experienced personally during Activities Day, a Columbia sponsored event, a group came over to us and they were protesting. I was by a table and one of the things this group continues to say is that minorities are being exploited by the military. I told the gentleman who was screaming and shouting that I'm a minority and I joined the military. I did so willingly and proudly. And he said, that's because you're too stupid to understand that you're being exploited. My response to that was to file a complaint with the administration.

Host: Well, that was a good disciplined response . . .

Matt: I kept my military bearing.

Host: ... well, I'm sure you were angry. Is the administration facilitating this kind of conduct? Is this the conduct of just a few people? I went to Columbia. I went to Columbia Law School. It's a great institution. I think you guys would both agree . . .

Matt: Absolutely.

Host: . . . that it is. It has a history of embracing the military back to World War Two. I mean, General Eisenhower became its president. What's going on do you think?

Matt: Well, sometime around I guess the Vietnam era, 68, things changed and became very radicalized. But today, certain people feel its okay to pick on members who are veterans at Columbia in order to protest the war or politics.

Host: Well, let me tell you what Columbia says about these charges. They say, "We value the contributions that our students who serve or have served in the military make to our diverse intellectual community, and we are committed to ensure that these students are treated with the same courtesy and respect that all of our students deserve. Indeed, the men and women who serve our country in uniform deserve our utmost admiration and support". Now, does that satisfy you guys?

Oscar: Well, I remain cautiously optimistic that the university will stand to its commitment to tolerance of all people. We're very familiar with the university's tolerance towards racial, ethnic, religious and other cultural groups. I'd like to see if they can actually walk the walk and extend that same tolerance to military service men and women.

Host: Matt, Oscar, each tell me one thing that Columbia can do today to make it better for our military men and women who are studying at Columbia, our veterans, or people who are going to go into the service at Columbia.

Oscar: I can tell you two things, Peter. The first thing is that Columbia needs to alter or rather amend its Discrimination and Harassment Policy, because right now it . . .

Host: We're running out of time. What do you say?

Matt: I say when an event like this happens, they should immediately make a statement, at least something denouncing this kind of behavior.

Host: Okay. Thank you both, and thank you for your service.

Oscar: Thank you.

** END 0627 hrs.

Transcribed by Eric Chen (elc2003 at columbia.edu). Post date: 11FEB06.

Monday, February 06, 2006

MilVets Library: Press Release: Anti-Military Discrimination at Columbia University

Original at http://columbiamilvets2005-2006library.blogspot.com/2006/02/press-release-anti-military.html

06Mar06: Success! The Columbia University Discrimination Policy has been amended. The restricted and inadequate "Vietnam era and disabled veterans" of the old policy has been exchanged for the inclusive "military status". See the revised policy.

Background note on this action. Letter of support for Matt Sanchez.

** Media references below - content last updated 24Mar06. Columbia Spectator links updated 26JAN07.**
________________________

U.S. MILITARY VETERANS OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY (MILVETS)

PRESS RELEASE

The Columbia University Provost has met with veteran and military-related students to discuss anti-military discrimination on the Columbia campus. Further meetings with senior university administrators are being arranged. In the Fall of 2005, a Columbia student was verbally attacked by other students for being a U.S. Marine. The Columbia Spectator, New York Sun, and Fox News (The Fox Report, Fox and Friends) have covered this incident.

U.S. MILITARY VETERANS OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY asks that Columbia University amend its Discrimination and Harassment Policy to grant all veterans and military-related persons protected status. Likewise, we hold the university responsible for promoting a military sensitive environment on campus and preventing further discrimination of veterans and military-related persons at the university.

An effective discrimination policy protects the diverse members of any evolving academic community, sets out transparent standards of acceptable conduct, and reinforces the distinct line between free speech and discrimination. This allows for the safe environment that is essential for everyone to participate fully in the academic domain.

The current discrimination policy of Columbia University, which limits codified protection to “Vietnam era and disabled” veterans, is outdated and inadequate for the present-day veteran and military-related population. Last semester, a student at a university event was verbally attacked for being a U.S. Marine. This combined with a recent poll among Columbia’s veterans and military-related persons further confirms the need for reform of the Discrimination and Harassment Policy.

As Columbia President Lee Bollinger stated in response to the recent hate crime incident in the Ruggles dormitory, "The entire Columbia community is injured when any of its members are made, unjustly, to feel vulnerable. Such deplorable acts of hate have no place at Columbia and will not be tolerated." We hope Columbia University will make the necessary changes to show that discrimination against veterans and military-related persons also will not be tolerated.


Oscar Escano
President
U.S. Military Veterans of Columbia University
Website: www.columbia.edu/cu/usmilvetscu
Contact: oje2001 -at- columbia.edu
________________________

PREVIOUS COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT POLICY

Relevant passages that limit university protection to "status as a Vietnam Era or disabled veteran" can be found here: POLICY STATEMENT ON DISCRIMINATION AND SEXUAL HARASSMENT (scroll down to Definitions).

Definitions

For purposes of this policy, discrimination . . . [is] defined as follows:

Discrimination

Discrimination may occur by:

1. treating members of a protected class less favorably because of their membership in that class. The protected groups are based upon race, color, religion, sex, age, national or ethnic origin, citizenship, disability, sexual orientation, marital status, status as a Vietnam era or disabled veteran, the actual or perceived status of an individual as a victim of domestic violence; or

2. having a policy or practice that has a disproportionately adverse impact on protected class members.
________________________

Fox News interview (transcript) with Oscar Escano and Matt Sanchez, 2/3/06.

PRINT MEDIA COVERAGE (from latest to earliest):

"Discrimination Policy Amended" by Matt Mireles, Columbia Spectator News, 3/24/06. [working link]
New Policy Wording Adds Military Status to Protected Group List

Website: "Friends of Sanchez" created by Ryan Delany, milvet at Harvard University.

"Military Veterans Bring Diverse Voices to Columbia Community" by the MilVets E-board (Oscar Escano, Luke Stalcup and Mike Podberesky), Columbia Spectator Letter to the Editor, 2/21/06. [working link]

"ROTC and the Ivory Tower: Cease Fire" by Adam Weinstein, Columbia Spectator Opinion, 2/13/06. [working link]

"Sanchez Lodges Protest" by Sadia Latifi, Columbia Spectator News, 2/9/06. [working link]
Reserve Marine Files Grievance With SDA Against ISO Protest

"Veterans Take Grievances to Columbia Provost" by Alec Magnet, New York Sun, 2/1/06.

"Revisiting Vietnam" by Monique Dols, Columbia Spectator Opinion, 1/30/06. [working link]

"A Conservative Witch-Hunt" by Zach Zill, Columbia Spectator Opinion , 1/27/06. [working link]

"A Firm Stance" by Laura Brunts, Columbia Spectator News, 1/25/06. [working link]
CU Marine Reservist Targeted In Angry Confrontation; No Disciplinary Action Taken

"Letter Defending Campus Actions Towards Military Recruiters Was Ignorant and Inconsiderate" by Todd Murphy, Columbia Spectator Letter to the Editor, 1/24/06. [working link]

"Columnist Exaggerated Campus Treatment of Military Recruiters" by Jonah Birch, Columbia Spectator Letter to the Editor, 1/19/06. [working link]

"Veterans Deserve Better" by Chris Kulawik, Columbia Spectator Opinion, 1/18/06. [working link]

Labels:

<< Newer
Older >>
Main
Note that this site is an "information dump", which implies that inclusion of an item in this archive is for reference and preservation, not necessarily a reflection of the view of MilVets.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Attribution with link to the material and title of the material, please.

© Copyright 2002-2008.

Powered by Blogger